The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (French: Le Pli: Leibnitz et le Baroque) is a book by Gilles Deleuze which offers a new interpretation of the Baroque and of. GILLES DELEUZE. The Fold*. MATERIAL COILS1. The Baroque does not refer to an essence Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Philosophical Papers and Letters, vol. The Fold has ratings and 17 reviews. In The Fold, Gilles Deleuze argues that Leibniz’s writings constitute the grounding elements of a Baroque philos.
|Published (Last):||25 May 2013|
|PDF File Size:||9.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Return to Book Page. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.
Another way to put this? Alain Badiou – – In Bxroque V. How to explain human complexity? The War Machine What is Philosophy? Unfortunately, most of us probably won’t know what we are looking at.
Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque
I get it for artists, but for scholarship that does NOT research chiaroscuro, Bach, or other relavent art works, I don’t see the cash value.
Sign in Create an account. Jeffrey Bell – – Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 1: His thought locates him as an influential figure in ggilles considerations of society, creativity and subjectivity. Everything … are the folded things! In Negotiations he famously said that he take the author by the rear and gives birth to a monster the other exception to this being the Kant book. Gilles Deleuze enthusiastically defends for the art of folding inspired of Baroque.
He wrote on Spinoza, Nietzche, Kant, Leibniz and others, including literary authors and works, cinema, and art.
This makes all determination a matter of scale, which is another way of saying that it’s a matter of categorization. Dec 30, Victoria rated it liked it Recommends it for: As always, Deleuze doesn’t go easy on us. Sep 09, Lewis colburn rated it deleize was ok.
The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque
There were pretty pictures and charts, though. The world is an infinite series of curvatures or inflections, and the entire world is enclosed in the soul from one point of view. I wanted to find out more about folding but this book was too technical for me.
Do psycho-physics really have any currency beyond trying to explain God’s relationship to the world for Leibniz? Maggie Maclure – – Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 2: Deleuze would have us absorb melody from pure harmony, building concepts and trends from the multitude of monads which would pose a mass of singularities. Gilles Deleuze – – Continuum. Similarly, the world is interpreted as a body of infinite folds and surfaces that twist and delueze through compressed glles and space.
It is possible that these two paragraphs were originally meant to be extended and Deleuze ran out of steam, but I don’t have anything to support this.
How to understand their internal an Everything … are the folded things! His thought locates him as an influential figure in present-day considerations of society, crea Deleuze is a key figure in postmodern French philosophy. Though a challenge as all worthwhile reads should beI would recommend this book to any – you won’t be disappointed.
Mohammad Reza rated it really liked it Sep 01, Westerhoff – – Journal of the History of Ideas 60 3: In Negotiations he famously said that he take the author by the rear and gives birth to a monster the other except I found myself confused throughout this text.
Deleuze and the Pragmatic Legacy. The bits about monadic point of view and the worlding-song of the monadic choir in order to express the inflected infinite line of the world was beautifully explicated or unfolded. Rather than taking a metaphysics of presence as the primary scene, he deontologizes thought by collapsing it into its constituent particles, called monads.
I especially admire Deleuze’s transformed understanding of Leibniz’s so called parallelism, displacing the idea of causation and substance through his thinking of events and becomings.
Gilles Deleuze, The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque – PhilPapers
Leibniz and the Baroque by Gilles Deleuze. In the absence of our familiar points of reference I suspect much of this would appear to be senseless and unusable to most of us, even though in our daily lives, we go through the process of re constitution all the time.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Want to Read saving…. Deleuze and the Spinozist Lekbniz in Philosophy. Which set of monads should we take to be primary?