But in Why I Am Not a Secularist, distinguished political theorist William E. Connolly argues that secularism, although admirable in its pursuit of freedom and . Why I Am Not a Secularist. By William E. Connolly. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, p. $ – Volume 94 Issue 2 – J. Donald Moon. Why I Am Not a Secularist has 43 ratings and 2 reviews. Katie said: I really enjoyed this book. Connolly provides a unique perspective on themes in secul.
|Published (Last):||25 August 2018|
|PDF File Size:||3.60 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
References to this book The Enchantment of Modern Life: Connolly has articulated a powerful case for a pluralist ethos that is respectful of the essential contestability of social reality and cultivates a generous and forbearing attitude towards political and philosophical differences among various collectivities.
Connolly is a political theorist known for his work on democracy and pluralism. Connolly demonstrates cpnnolly far we still have to go to understand what it means to live in a democratic society, and some of his ideas will help us come to grips with these vital and unresolved issues. Books by William E. Agreed Syllabi and Un-Agreed Values: Purchase Subscription prices and ordering Short-term Access To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above.
Home Current Catalogs Blog. In response, he crafts a new model of public life that more accurately reflects the needs of contemporary politics.
The Department of Political Science
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Lists with This Book.
My library Help Advanced Book Search. Allison rated it it was ok Apr 26, Many liberal secularists decry this trend, rejecting any interaction between politics and religion Women’s Music and Democratic Politics. It also asks for modern secularists to see the faults of their own position and the ways in which it may ostracize persons and restrict political change.
Eduardo rated it liked it Nov 08, John Courtney Murray – – Thought: Most users should sign in with their email address. Lreckson rated it really liked it Sep 21, Penguin, This book deserves careful consideration.
Many liberal secularists decry this trend, rejecting any interaction between politics and religion. Connolly argues that secularism, although admirable in its pursuit of freedom and diversity, too often undercuts these goals through its narrow and intolerant understandings of public reason. wny
Why I Am Not a Secularist
Google Books no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Sahara rated it really liked it Apr 08, Ali Harfouch rated it it was amazing May 15, Every perspective that enters into public discourse ought to acknowledge its comparative contestability.
Hale – – International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 3: Connolly never directly addresses this question, for he mainly discusses the rhyzomatic as a method of engagement between different constituencies. Connolly challenges secularism, xonnolly simply as a model of politics, but also as a modus vivendi that has a false conception of what its history is.
At its best, secularism remains immodest in its claim to provide the authoritative nnot for public reason; at secularizt worst, it overlooks possibilities for selective collaboration between religious and nonreligious perspectives in politics.
Kevin Stilley rated it liked it Jan 11, I am personally fine with socialism, but Connolly seems to think that a socialist perspective u be fit into a Capitalistic social and political system. History of Western Philosophy. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
William E. Connolly, Why I Am Not a Secularist – PhilPapers
Sign in Create secu,arist account. Then, while elaborating an ethos of engagement that appreciates this element, he examines capital punishment, the War on Drugs, the liberal idea of the nation, the public role of atheism, and the right to die.
Kierkegaard, Despair and the Possibility of Education: Interesting, dense, but ultimately unsatisfying. Sign In Forgot password?
It calls for an unique refashioning of secularism, a method of agonistic engagement between persons and parties with different comprehensive doctrines, and promotes a deep pluralism where no one group or ideology holds the authoritative center of public political discourse. Brenda Watson – – Think 8 conno,ly Connolly argues that secularism, although admirable seculqrist its pursuit of freedom and diversity, secularisg often undercuts these goals through its narrow and intolerant understandings of public reason.
They refashion existing moral norms without doing away with morals altogether. The Secularist Temper in University Life. He believes that in dealing with controversial issues such as the death penalty, the right to die, and the war on drugs, secularism has failed to recognize the complexity of public views because it has excluded religious and theistic viewpoints.
Throughout this provocative volume, Connolly presents convincing evidence of the need to refashion secularism to foster a more responsive public life and a more generous political culture.
To be agonistic instead of antagonistic; to admit the contestability of your beliefs; to try and fit a socialist idea of the public sphere into a Capitalistic society; and to rise above visceral reactions, are tall exhortations for a society like the United States. Tamta Khalvashi rated it really liked it Aug 03, No one philosophy i.
Not to mention Martin Luther who, in spite of his deeply held religious connoloy, argued for the separation of Church and Qhy. I really enjoyed this book.
An Atheist and William Connolly
Deep pluralism and the politics of becoming requires that minority views and asecular philosophies i. The Enchantment of Modern Life: For some people and groups, to be contested is to be disrespected. This way the public sphere can still operate as a medium for social and ideological critique.