In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 has ratings and 14 reviews. John said: In many ways, this book is necessary w.
|Published (Last):||25 March 2017|
|PDF File Size:||17.41 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.78 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikipedia
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. His early work was written under various pseudonyms who present their own distinctive viewpoints in a complex dialogue. Focuses on what is asserted. In the name of Christian faith Kierkegaard rejected not this or that element in Hegelianism but the whole, referring to it in mockery as c the System. Brian Donohue rated it liked it Jul 31, To acknowledge that we are existing, first of all, which in itself is a paradox, and to accept postsript paradox rather than try to explain it.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikiquote
Feb 29, Dustyn Hessie rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the subjective thinker’s relation to the truth of Christianity. However, unlike his other pseudonymous works, Kierkegaard attaches his name as editor to this work, showing the importance of the Postscript to Kierkegaard’s overall authorship.
These puzzles are thick and knotted. I had a fear and trembling such as perhaps no one else had.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Babbeuf rated it it was amazing Jun 26, In this way, he can appeal to any reader simply delighted in the complexity and movement of language, and not necessarily just the bones-and-grit madcore thinkaholic.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1
Excellent thinkers but really a fragmwnts to get through. Paul Callister rated it it was amazing Sep 13, To his great credit, Hannay resists this temptation unfailingly.
He was referring to Kierkegaard’s distrust of system builders which he discussed in The Concluding Unscientific Postscript p. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Yet it is unlikely to replace the Hong edition in scholarly circles. History, science, and speculative philosophy all deal with objective knowledge.
Kierkegaard strongly criticised both the Hegelianism of his time and what he saw as the empty formalities of the Church of Denmark. In this regard Socrates, who lived a life of truth-seeking amid and despite ignorance, is a helpful existential paradigm.
Quotes from Concluding Unscie Luis rated it really liked it Nov 09, It was an attack on what Kierkegaard saw as Hegel’s deterministic philosophy. The chapter first considers Kierkegaard’s views about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism within the context of the relationship between modernity and Christianity and the relationship of history to faith. Jan 10, Dan Borkowski rated it it was amazing.
Emil Brunner mentioned Kierkegaard 51 times in his book Man in Revolt and wrote a semi-serious parody of Kierkegaard’s idea of truth as subjectivity by making truth objectivity in Pages to import images to Wikidata Articles containing Danish-language text Webarchive template wayback links All stub articles. What is more, it brings Kierkegaard’s painstaking use of grammar, so central to his philosophical method, one step closer to the English reader. It discusses Christianity’s content by means of analogies which it keeps taking back, citing variations on the formula understanding is revocationn, Classical, Early, and Medieval Poetry and Poets: Carmen Camey rated it it was amazing Mar 14, Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Civil War American History: Hannay’s key strength as a translator is his daring. Kierkegaard was the prophet of modern subjectivity, and this book is genius. I have many of his books. Jan 12, Andrew Votipka rated it it was amazing Shelves: